I had an interesting email yesterday from AA7FV, based about 15 miles north of Tucson, Arizona. The title was 'What antenna?'
Darrel, an UK ex-pat, told me of his surprise to receive a -3dB S/N report from my WSPR reception on 14MHz, using the GB0BYL call.
Darrel commented, speculating that I "must have an extraordinary antenna there to be able to give me a -3 dB s/n report"
"I have rarely - in fact I think never - had such a good report from Europe or the UK. Other WSPR reports I was receiving from Europe or the UK at the time were typically 20 dB weaker than that."
Darrel knows what he's talking about. He's a semi-retired professional astronomer with a Physics Ph.D. from Cambridge University. Even better than his academic qualifications is his rhombic antenna pointing at Europe. A rhombic like this has a typical gain in excess of 15dBi on its main, very narrow front and rear lobes.
Even with my standard vertical delta loop as the antenna for 14MHz, I've managed contacts - either TX or RX - when others are unable to, over a long period of time and I've blogged about them regularly. Others tend to think this is machoistic bravado, but I see it only as reporting what happens from a clear, elevated, highly mineralised site overlooking the sea. Magic and bravado aren't necessary. The environment and consequent antenna pattern (i.e. extremely low, even sub-horizontal radiation) is what makes it all happen.
To reinforce the great potential of my QTH, I happened to pick up the tiny 10mW from ZL1RS' BB05 balloon, and making its way eastwards across the Pacific, lying close to Easter Island at the time.
![]() |
Now tell me the QTH isn't a good radio site! |
The critical thing is that, at the time of consulting the WSPR database (evening of 27/04/2018), I was one of only two stations across Europe, Africa and Asia (one station from JA) that had heard from the balloon since its launch, 3 days earlier. Curiously, ZL1RS says that the transmitter is 50mW, whereas the WSPR reception reports issued by all stations claimed 10mW. Either way, it's a long way for a tiny signal, even from 30,000 feet and a full vertical dipole dangling underneath the balloon!
So, I think I am now content, faced with all this entirely non-biased, human-free WSPR assessment, that this QTH is very special for radio, and that it yields world-beating performance from simple (but always well-made and matched) wire antennas.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Polite, constructive comment only. Any nonsense won't make it any further...
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.